Most countries see the global security as their main goal. As such they construct robust navy units and arm them with the most recent technology and weapons in pursuit of defence and protection. Defense is just another way of saying conflict, used by governments to mirror their non-aggressive posture in their region which doesn't carry the destructive connotation of conflict, comparable to Ministry or Division of Defense. In army operations planning, a defensive strategy is the policy of preventing an attack, or minimizing the harm of an assault, by the forces assuming protection in strategic depth for preventing an enemy from conquering territory. Inside the scope of a national defense coverage, protection is used to incorporate most military issues.
Defence ways are employed by nations for numerous reasons. For instance, an excellent instance of employing defensive strategy techniques can be seen when used against American troopers in the Vietnam Conflict. By the use of smaller mobile guerrilla forces wearing Body Armour, the Vietcong waged a struggle on the sources of the American troopers, which included destroying provides and provide routes. Additionally they used the Individuals resources when producing booby traps, together with discarded gadgets comparable to tin cans as well as unexploded bombs which they might gather and use for mines.
Eventually the efforts of the smaller cell defensive guerrillas triggered such an effect that the main military was in a position to overrun the American forces with an enormous assault know because the Tet Offensive. Nowhere is this example extra outlined than in the Cold War stand offs of the mid to late twentieth century. One particular instance of this is the Cuban Missile Disaster which concerned the US and the Soviet Union in 1962. The Soviet and Cuban authorities had positioned nuclear weapons on Cuba as seen by American reconnaissance planes and, with the stress between the 2 international locations already palpable, a standoff ensued with the 'very real' menace of a nuclear warfare occurring. Thankfully diplomatic proceedings ensured that the disaster was settled comparatively amicably with the dismantling of the weaponry and a no-invasion agreement in place from the American authorities.
The role of military defence has been gradually shifted away from its primary role of providing security to enhancing commercial interest. With industrial growth and advancement of science and technology, the defence production led to a market oriented producer- purchaser relation between the developed and developing countries.The poor nation afflicted with conflicts became a super market for defence deals. For the powerful, military prowess which was earlier synonymous with political power has become a trademark of economic power.
But restraining factors were at work. The intellectual circle and the wisdom acquired from past experiences through different Air Force Portal networks as also the active international diplomacy successfully trained the world community to disarm for peace and development. The agreement to network for prosperity through friendly trades and to resolve conflicts via peaceful dialogues have been recommended vehemently.
History evidenced the worthless used of armed coercion. If a stick is given to a hungry man to stop him from his cry for hunger, he will roar to bite you and connive with the neighbor to cause disaster. Instead of using the resources to crush the anger, it would be wiser to use the resource to fill the hungry belly and teach the hungry man to grow crops to sustain his future needs. The resources used for military purchase can fruitfully be used for peace and development. The political compulsions may tempt the authority to take pride in the power of the defence force. The military men pride themselves as the savior of the nation. With due respect and regard to the defence services, I have a considered opinion to express. I think military might is an outdated notion of exalting the national self esteem. Recent history of military powers have shown the fatality of this approach. The pride of the nation is in the human asset and any nation that failed to nurture its most precious asset will lose its national pride even if it owns the most sophisticated war weapons to erase the entire human race.
Big defence budgets in the developed world may entail an economic investment return out of defence production and sale exports. But how long can this go on? For poor countries, big defence budget produces a negative return, and hits the belly of the poor as his pie is taken away with every military purchase.In the new age, the defence security trade mark will diminish as more focus is now on economic security and sustainability of the future. The creative and innovative thinking to meet the future challenges will be a supreme consideration while war weapons will be valueless in the approaching apocalypse.
Some people believe that the United States goes out of its way to start wars, but is that really a fair assessment? No, not really, still it's not to say that a rogue nation-state despot or dictator should go out of their way to provoke us either. Not long ago, I was discussing this with an acquaintance, and they indicated that; "without wars, the defense industry would not exist in the end." You can see, they don't care what they build really; they just get a contract and set up a project management team, make prototypes, and then manufacture. They could make day-care centers for kids or military bases at UMCA, they don't care. It's like lawyers, if they cannot practice one type of law, at they will try to sue you for something else. We don't live in a world where there is not some crisis to take care of.
Further, I don't see nations with nukes as so bad, more I am worried about lunatic dictators, or terrorists having them. I'd rather the world didn't have nuclear weapons at all, but since so many nations do, and more will soon follow, I very much doubt any nation will get rid of them, because they will want to be able to protect themselves, against the last nation that refuses to get rid of them. Now then, my acquaintance states the obvious;
In my personal library I have almost a whole row of books on the topic of nuclear proliferation, the Cold War, and many reports put forth during the Cold War by the Rand Corporation. I believe it is scary stuff, and it's quite unfortunate, but it is what it is and we must deal with it without blinders. Please consider all this and think on it. If you have any comments, questions, or concerns you may e-mail me. I will not accept e-mails from anti-nuclear power activists.